Younger Oklahoma jurors, accustomed to a world of filtered selfies and carefully constructed online narratives, might be more forgiving. They may be less likely to see past lies as indicative of a fundamental character flaw for truthfulness in criminal trials.
What constitutes a legal versus unconstitutional seizure of a person? In Oklahoma, knowing the law can make the difference when it comes to your liberty. Criminal procedure is not a suggestion, it is the law.
…it once again reinforces the degradation of the 4th amendment and our rights to protection against government agencies being able to reach into our lives based on their subjective intent, instead of hard-fast evidence.
In a time when society’s relationship with the police seems fractured, our judiciary must draw a line in the sand to prevent the 4th Amendment from being further dismantled.
